Stance
If the UN wants to help humanity, it should not fall for AI hype
How should the international governance of AI look like? This is the thorny question the UN Secretary General’s AI Advisory Body tries to address in its first interim report. We have highlighted some concerning aspects of the report in a recent consultation process.
We at AlgorithmWatch welcome the UN’s initiative to advance recommendations for an international governance framework of AI. Why does the initiative matter? The UN with its 193 member states is the biggest international organization globally. UN guidelines – even if not legally binding – can serve as a compass for national and international policy-making.
Our main concern regarding the interim report is that it construes a false balance between risks and opportunities related to AI. First of all, the report (falsely) promotes AI as a solution to many of humanity’s grave problems – such as climate change, poverty and hunger. Not only does this view dismiss the factors that have contributed to these global issues and which keep feeding them structurally – such as colonialism and capitalism. It also subscribes to the delusion that technological innovation will inevitably lead to a universal improvement in society.
Additionally, we are concerned that the report is advocating for a new technology without emphasizing the need to ensure that it won't worsen existing issues or create new problems. If we decide to tackle climate change with AI-enabled systems, for instance, we need to ensure that the development and use of AI systems – which often consumes large amounts of energy and carbon emissions – respects planetary boundaries.
AlgorithmWatch is looking forward to further contributing to the debate within the UN, given the importance of multilateral governance frameworks in this field.